| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision |
| start [2025/10/31 00:23] – rcif | start [2025/10/31 02:15] (current) – rcif |
|---|
| 6/7/24 | 6/7/24 |
| ^ Venue ^ Date ^ Official Record ^ Summary ^ Status on the Public Agenda ^ | ^ Venue ^ Date ^ Official Record ^ Summary ^ Status on the Public Agenda ^ |
| | Federal District Court of Oregon [[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71481149/state-of-oregon-v-trump/|3:25-CV-01756]] //Oregon et al vs. Donald Trump, et al// ||| Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae || | | Federal District Court of Oregon [[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71481149/state-of-oregon-v-trump/|3:25-CV-01756]] //Oregon et al vs. Donald Trump, et al// || |
| | |
| | [[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71481149/124/state-of-oregon-v-trump/|Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief]] Provides a distinct analysis that complements and challenges both the parties' arguments: offers legal precedents and factual predicates not yet considered, and a detailed appendix with historical contexts and ideological subtexts and policy recommendations, which will assist both jurists and policymakers in addressing questions of Comparative revolution and just war theory. Most critically, the brief proposes a practical, constitutionally sound remedy-a narrowly tailored time, place, and manner restriction (curfew) implemented either locally or, contingently, under federal authority (40 U.S.C. § 1315) as the least restrictive alternative-which the Court may consider or authorize via declaratory judgment. This analysis directly informs the Court's |
| | consideration of the First Amendment, federalism issues, necessity, proportionality, and |
| | available equitable relief in advance of the merits trial. Offers a Distinct Rationale for Maintaining the TRO preventing National Guard |
| | deployment: argues not necessarily from a lack of "colorable assessment'' by |
| | the Executive, but from the failure to exhaust less restrictive, non-military |
| | alternatives - the 40 U.S.C. § 1315 curfew, consistent with Ward v. Rock Against Racism. Analyzes City and State Governmental Failure and Raises Standing Concerns. Also questions the recent Executive Order declaring "Antifa" a terrorist organization, and invites the Supremes to overturn the mistaken precedent in //Nazis vs. Skokie// | |
| | Portland City Council 22 October 2025 ||| | | | Portland City Council 22 October 2025 ||| | |
| | [[https://youtu.be/xorQixRC5ic?t=828|MultCo Board of Commissioners 16 October 2025 13:48]] ||| The RCIF is "Antifascist", like many other Republican and Democratic groups, including the U.S. Army. "AntifascistAktion" was a front of the KPD, the German communist party. It was a terrorist organization that tried to overthrow the Weimar republic. Mainstream media have failed to do the analysis. So have the DOJ, FBI, The Education department, and the MAGA influencers invited to president Trump's "roundtable on Antifa". | | | [[https://youtu.be/xorQixRC5ic?t=828|MultCo Board of Commissioners 16 October 2025 13:48]] ||| The RCIF is "Antifascist", like many other Republican and Democratic groups, including the U.S. Army. "AntifascistAktion" was a front of the KPD, the German communist party. It was a terrorist organization that tried to overthrow the Weimar republic. Mainstream media have failed to do the analysis. So have the DOJ, FBI, The Education department, and the MAGA influencers invited to president Trump's "roundtable on Antifa". | |
